1 INTRODUCTION

Recognizing the immediate need within the permitting community for evaluating the

impacts of sources of air pollution located more than 50 kilometers from Class I

wilderness areas and national parks, the Interagency Workgroup on Air Quality Modeling

(IWAQM) drafted an interim Phase 1 recommendation from existing "off-the-shelftechniques"

(EPA, 1993). The interim approach recommended the use of the Lagrangian

puff model, MESOPUFF-II (Scire et al., 1984), to evaluate the impacts of pollutants from

sources located more than 50 kilometers from Class I areas, and up to several hundred

kilometers from Class I areas. The impacts of concern are the allowable Prevention of

Significant Deterioration (PSD) Class I increases in pollutants (increments), the National

Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), and the Air Quality Related Values (AQRVs).

AQRV impacts include such effects as visibility degradation and acidic deposition. The

interim recommendation was envisioned as suitable for single source impact analyses, as

well as for multiple source (cumulative) impact analyses.

It is important to note that by restricting the modeling techniques to "off-the-shelf,"

certain limitations were incurred. These include limits in considering the effects of

terrain on long range transport and dispersion, an underestimation of the conversion of

sulfur dioxide to sulfate when polluted air interacts with clouds, and an overestimation of

particulate nitrate when a limited number of sources are considered. Furthermore, the

estimations of the impacts of sources on regional visibility are simplistic and do not

account for all of the processes important to regional visibility. Nonetheless, the

IWAQM considers the techniques to provide a useful assessment of air quality impacts in

Class I areas.

In the course of developing the Phase 1 interim recommendations, it was recognized that

even if the modeling techniques could be agreed upon between the various federal

agencies, there would still remain both technical and policy issues in implementing an

assessment of pollutant impacts on a Class I area. In general, the fact that Class I area

analyses focus on a fixed piece of real estate sets them apart from Class II analyses. In

Class II analyses, the area of concern is a circular area (typically of radius 50 kilometers

or less) centered on the source in question; whereas in Class I analyses the source and the

Class I area are usually separated by a significant distance. This occasions a unique set of

issues which need consideration from and cooperation among a variety of organizations,

given the need to assess the incremental increase in concentration values, the need to

evaluate AQRVs, and the added role of the Federal Land Mangers (FLMs).

 

 

n1301 - n1302 - n1303 - n1304 - n1305 - n1306 - n1307 - n1308 - n1309 - n1310 - n1311 - n1312 - n1313 - n1314 - n1315 - n1316 - n1317 - n1318 - n1319 - n1320 - n1321 - n1322 - n1323 - n1324 - n1325 - n1326 - n1327 - n1328 - n1329 - n1330 - n1331 - n1332 - n1333 - n1334 - n1335 - n1336 - n1337 - n1338 - n1339 - n1340 - n1341 - n1342 - n1343 - n1344 - n1345 - n1346 - n13247 - n1348 - n1349 - n1350

 

   Flag of Portugal 

 english:

 castellano: DISPER CUSTIC DESCAR RADIA    italiano:     

 

 français:    português:  

 

deutsch:

 

 

deutsch: DIS CUS  DES  RAD

castellano: DIS CUS DES  RAD   english: DIS CUS DES RAD  

 

 português: DIS CUS DES RAD   italiano:   DIS CUS  DES RAD

 

français:  DIS CUS DES RAD