1. The graphical performance procedures specified in Section
5.1.1 should be conducted for each meteorological episode. To
assess model performance, the Technical Committee should
analyze the time-series plots, ground-level isopleths,
quantile-quantile plots, and scatterplots. Use of "paired"
predictions of daily maxima may also be considered.
2. The statistical performance measures specified in Section
5.1.2 should also be derived and evaluated for each meteorological
episode. When interpreting these measures, the
monitoring network density and design should be considered.
Caution is urged when interpreting the statistical measures
for a sparse monitoring network.
It is recommended that the statistical performance measures be
compared with the following ranges:
!Unpaired highest prediction accuracy: ±15-20 percent
!Normalized bias: ±5-15 percent
!Gross error of all pairs >60 ppb: 30-35 percent
If all of these statistical measures are within the ranges
shown, and the graphical performance procedures also are
interpreted to yield acceptable results, then the model is
judged to be performing acceptably.
If any of the statistical measures are worse than the above
n1151 - n1152 - n1153 - n1154 - n1155 - n1156 - n1157 - n1158 - n1159 - n1160 - n1161 - n1162 - n1163 - n1164 - n1165 - n1166 - n1167 - n1168 - n1169 - n1170 - n1171 - n1172 - n1173 - n1174 - n1175 - n1176 - n1177 - n1178 - n1179 - n1180 - n1181 - n1182 - n1183 - n1184 - n1185 - n1186 - n1187 - n1188 - n1189 - n1190 - n1191 - n1192 - n1193 - n1194 - n1195 - n1196 - n1197 - n1198 - n1199 - n1200
castellano: DISPER CUSTIC DESCAR RADIA italiano:
deutsch: DIS CUS DES RAD
castellano: DIS CUS DES RAD english: DIS CUS DES RAD
português: DIS CUS DES RAD italiano: DIS CUS DES RAD
français: DIS CUS DES RAD